Showing posts with label turquoise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label turquoise. Show all posts

Sunday, 11 June 2017

Is it real? A musing on gemstones and their simulants and knowing what you're buying.

All the above are types of synthetic ruby.   Photo GIA.
Putting my gemmologist hat on today! 
 
If you are buying jewellery described as containing some sort of gem (s) and pearls, don't be afraid to question the authenticity of the stones or pearls and even the metals. Please!
 
Although replacing gems with simulants has happened for centuries, I have recently seen a lot of people who make jewellery, describing the items they use as a particular gem when they are actually something else entirely.   What are they really?   Often they are a lower cost stone that has been treated to look like a valuable gem and that is usually a manmade / synthetic copy, glass or even plastic!
 
Natural amber (left), heated and clarified amber with its typical sun-spangle look (middle) and plastic (right).
 
Wouldn't you feel more comfortable knowing what you have really bought?   Whether its $30 or $3000, the customer has a right to know exactly what they are getting.    
 
Moonstone (left) and opalite (glass) (right)

The practice appears to becoming rife - in just one day, I saw these examples online:
 
"moonstone" that is really glass,
"pearls" made of shell coated with a lustrous 'paint', 
''lapis lazuli" that is sodalite (a less costly and more brittle stone that contains no pyrite) 
"lapis lazuli" that is a manmade simulant; 
"turquoise" that is dyed magnesite or howlite;
"turquoise" that is actually a very low grade turquoise that has been powdered, compressed and dyed;
"silver" and "gold" that is plated metal;
"chrysocolla" which is dyed jasper, agate or manmade;
"amber" which is really plastic;
"sea-sediment jasper" which is a manmade stone (made with ground up stone and a lot of dye).
and if I looked more the list would go on ... and on! 

(And the prices of the jewellery containing the misnamed stones were not just a few dollars but in the range from $30-$410!)

Cultured pearls (left, photo GIA), shell pearls (right)

Even some jewellery stores gloss over reality. Those "emerald" and 9ct gold rings for $250 with a lovely green colour you see in the jewellery brochures? Look at the fine print and you will find they are either synthetic, a manmade simulant or at the very least a composite stone.  A few months ago I was collecting a watch repair in a reputable jewellery store and heard and saw a sales assistant refer to a synthetic emerald as just "emerald" to a potential customer, without going into the detail of what it actually was made from!
 
Lapis lazuli (left) is often replaced with sodalite (right) (photo ivenchev.com)
 
Imitation Lapis Lazuli under magnification (photo GIA)
To add to the confusion, many manmade simulants have gem sounding names eg. opalite is actually manmade glass. "silver tone" is a way of saying base metal with a silver colour, "goldstone" is a manmade aventurine glass.  Cubic Zirconia has been around so long that it's almost accepted as a gem even though it is manmade and can come in virtually any colour you desire. 

Photo: Beadworks

Whilst not everyone selling jewellery is meaning to deceive you by misnaming the materials an item is made with - I'm sure many are really lovely people who just want to create - but their lack of knowledge (and sometimes experience) means they believe what the wholesaler is telling them.   
 
A couple of decades ago, the ability to buy gemstones or pearls was limited to a small number of jewellery professionals who had a relationship with cutters and gemstone dealers and occasionally dealt directly with the miners.   Alternately a visit by a tourist to an area that was known for a certain gem - eg. Tahiti for black pearls, Baltic countries for amber, etc. meant they could bring back jewellery or stones/pearls.     Synthetics and simulants were available but there was less intent by the dealer to deceive, although people did occasionally get caught out, usually by a 'bargain'.

These days, however, there are thousands of websites selling all variety of gemstones and pearls, some are long established and inherently honest but, unfortunately, some are not so truthful in their descriptions - many describing items as what they are simulating rather than what material they actually are.  
 
 
Chrysocolla (left),  and some of the simulants:- (2nd from left) beads described on Etsy as "azurite chrysocolla jasper"ould likely to test as treated jasper, (3rd in row) beads described as "azurite chrysocolla jasper are a composite bead of stone powder, polymers and dyes, (right) "azurite chrysocolla" on a Chinese site - these could be dyed jasper or more likely are similar to the beads in the 3rd photo with a polymer coating for shine.
 
Add to this small hobby shops that may purchase strands of beads and on-sell them as what they believe them to be, but without expert knowledge to properly identify them - and the misinformation continues.

Even I have bought gems online described as "genuine" or "natural" and when they arrived have found them to be a mix of ground stone powder, polymers and dye! Ebay for example, is a minefield of misinformation.  (Although I am sure there are some selling genuine product as well). 

Not everyone who makes jewellery can be a gemmologist, but the creators and sellers of jewellery do need to take responsibility to make sure they know what they are buying and that the information they pass on is accurate, so that their customer has full confidence in what they are purchasing.

Goldstone is a type of aventurine glass, some people believe it to be a natural gemstone and sometimes it can be used as a simulant for Sunstone.

So, what can you do as a consumer? If the piece is very inexpensive, it is likely not to contain genuine gems or precious metals, so if you love a pair of earrings around $10-15 that are described as "moonstone and silver" just know that it is highly likely they are glass and plated metal. If you love them anyway, then by all means buy them as there is not a large monetary investment by you and you buy them just because you like them - not because they are supposedly moonstone. 
 
If, however, those same earrings are $40, $80, $120 or even $250... then you DO need to question the seller. Ask where the stone is from? (If they bought the stone from overseas or their local "bead shop", definitely ask more questions and perhaps do some research). Is it genuine? (brightly coloured "stones" are likely to be at the very least dyed, this has potential setbacks in the future - ask if the stone has been treated and if it will fade).   Is the silver sterling silver or plated metal? (this is important for allergies or if you want a piece to last.  Plated metal is likely to discolour relatively quickly and affect the look of the piece over a period of time).    You may be happy to buy non-genuine gems and metals, but you should at least know that is what you are purchasing.

If the person who is selling the item can't answer your questions fully, then perhaps you need to keep looking, or get someone in the field you know and trust to make something similar for you.

If you are buying online, do the same thing - have a look at the seller's experience and background and make sure the items are fully described.  If the information is scanty, then take into account the old saying "buyer beware". At the very least, send the seller a message and ask questions. 

Don't let this put you off buying jewellery, but if you love natural gems and cultured pearls and prefer to buy genuine gems and pearls, do question more :)
 
Till next,
Annette
 
P.S. I follow the CIBJO (the world jewellery confederation) standards for jewellery professionals and fully disclose materials and any known treatments.  I also examine gems and pearls that I use so that you know exactly what you are buying and can rest assured that your items are genuine and 'real'. :)  Annette Piper Dip. Gem. Handcrafted Jewellery
 
P.P.S.  If you are designer and/or maker of jewellery, do acquaint yourself with the Blue Books put out by the CIBJO, they are freely available to read and download on their website.

Tuesday, 24 February 2015

Statement Jewels abound at Academy Awards 2015!


Finally sense has returned to the red carpet!  Red carpet occasions are an opportunity to bring back that Hollywood glamour with elegant couture and dazzling jewellery that we remember, but that has been sadly lacking (with a few notable exceptions) in the last decade.

A large number of stylists have recognised that the statement necklace is back and encouraged their stars to wear some amazing jewels and the result is far more variety than has been seen in many years.   The red carpet abounded in necklaces, and not just on the major stars - many lesser known attendees were seen although sadly no great photos of their jewels.

One of the most talked about necklaces was on our own (Australian) actress Margot Robbie pictured at top.  A girl who grew up on a farm, there is definitely sign of that in her glamorous look.   She choose a Van Cleef and Arpel's Zip Antique Colombine featuring 150 diamonds and 300 sapphires in 18 carat gold.    This design was inspired by the Duchess of Windsor, who was quite the jewellery connoisseur.   In 1938 she suggested a necklace that could be actually zipped and converted.  In 1950 the technical problems of this design were solved and the result was a fully-functional zipper that could open for a necklace and close for a bracelet.     This isn't the Duchess' necklace but it is in the same sort of design and only a few of them have been made in the intervening decades.

Here is the piece as a bracelet...



Another Australian rocked the red carpet in a statement necklace  - Cate Blanchett went all out with a turquoise necklace by Tiffany & Co, that really popped against her black velvet gown.



A jaw-dropping statement piece was Scarlett Johannson's emerald green beaded necklace that could be a part of her Versace dress.    She also wore a Piaget ear cuff of emerald, diamond, aquamarine and green tourmaline. 



Viola Davis looked fabulous in a pearl and diamond necklace by Van Cleef & Arpels:



Model Behati Prinsloo's necklace by de Grisogono garnered quite a lot of attention.

 


Cheryl Hines chose a necklace and earring set that brought out her the green in her eyes even more.


And Lara Spencer  went all out with a turquoise and diamond ensemble:

  

The following ladies chose diamonds...some are a little predictable, but its a start!

Anna Kendrick had a 5 row diamond collar incorporated into her dress and 13 carats of diamonds in her earrings by Norman Silverman:

Faith Hill wore a long diamond pendant necklace although with the white dress the pendants were invisible in the distance photographs.


 Carmen Ejogo looking very art deco:





Jessica Chastain wearing Piaget:



 And Zoe Saldana wore 100 carats of diamonds in this Neil Lane necklace:


Part of the notable pendant brigade were Laura Dern in Bulgari, and Rosanna Arquette supporting her sister Patricia:






The following stars stylist's didn't get the memo that statement necklaces were the thing to be worn, however I will excuse Lupita Nyong'o whose dazzling dress contained 6000 pearls!  (note they were partially imitiation pearls) but her Chopard diamond earrings were a nice addition.






Here are some of the colourful earrings:

America Ferraro wore Irene Neuwirth's boulder opal and turquoise earrings:



Naomi Watts who is one of the few who usually wears a necklace went sans necklace this time,  but her Anna Hu Haute Joaillerie art deco sapphire earrings caught attention.  She also wore a Wallis Simpson diamond bracelet.


 Gwyneth Paltrow wore huge rubelite earrings also by Annu Hu Haute Joaillerie:



Robin Roberts in red:


Jennifer Hudson wore Lorraine Schwartz emerald earrings and ring:



Kerry Washington went for pink sapphire and diamond earrings by Fred Leighton:



Kelly Preston wore Kimberley McDonald geode earrings:



These ladies rocked green earrings:  Melanie Griffiths, Keltie Knight and Rashida Jones (the latter at the Vanity Fair after party).

  



Octavia Spencer chose Lorraine Schwartz earrings in a pale blue - possibly chalcedony, but its hard to pick from the photo.



And on to the diamond earrings...  here are some lovely ones that don't make me yawn lol.

Marion Cotillard in Chopard - I love how the design of the earrings reflects the circles in her dress.





Julianne Moore also in Chopard:


 Jamie Chung with a nice addition of a small sapphire to her radiating diamonds by Leticia Linton:




Meryl Streep in 19th century diamond fan pendant earrings by Fred Leighton:





Chloe Moretz in diamond ear cuffs


Jenna Dewar-Tatum in large diamond vines


Nancy O'Dell in long diamond encrusted drops:


And Rita Ora in diamonds and gold.


All in all, a very satisfying red carpet, don't you think!?

Till next,
Annette :)

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

Lauren Bacall's Jewellery Upcoming Auction


The amazing Lauren Bacall was a favourite actress of mine for decades (that's a bit telling in the age department!), playing strong if not sassy female roles.   Starring in films for seventy years, Ms Bacall died last August and the silver screen is poorer for her passing.    

A collection of selected bronze sculptures, jewellery, decorative arts, tribal works of art, prints, and paintings is currently touring  - it has been to  Hong Kong and Paris and is currently in London, before heading to Los Angeles and finally New York - where it will be auctioned at the end of March.

I love that she wasn't afraid of colour and she favoured texture and layering in her jewellery pieces!  


Amethyst earrings by Jean Schlumberger - the gems are only attached on one side, so that they would flutter with slight movements.





Sapphire earrings and a jadeite ring by Darlene de Selde :







A gold rope bracelet which Ms Bacall wore regularly with another similar bracelet that was encrusted with diamonds.   The little camel was a favourite of hers, and Elizabeth Gage was commissioned to turn it into a brooch.





An enamel and gold bangle also by Jean Schlumberger.





This divine ring features a central stone of amethyst surrounded by diamonds and bounded by turquoise.





According to the Auction house, Bonhams, prices are expected to be reasonable... what would you fancy owning?

Till next
Annette :)

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...